The Enforcement Directorate has rejected as “baseless” the allegations made by Xiaomi India officials.
The Enforcement Directorate on Saturday rejected as “baseless” the allegations that the statements of Xiaomi India officials, the wholly-owned subsidiary of Chinese mobile manufacturing company Xiaomi, were recorded “under coercion”, saying the charges were an afterthought.
The federal agency was responding to certain news reports that said Xiaomi alleged in a recent filing before the Karnataka High Court that its top executives were threatened with “physical violence and coercion” during their questioning by ED investigators in Bengaluru.
Also read: Looking for a smartphone? To check mobile finder click here.
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) issued a statement saying it was “a professional agency with strong work ethics and there was no coercion or threat to the officers of the company at any point of time”.
“The allegations that the statement of the officials of Xiaomi India was taken under coercion by ED is untrue and baseless.”
“The officials of Xiaomi India deposed their statements before ED under FEMA voluntarily in the most conducive environment on various occasions,” the agency said.
It said the statements were deposed by them on the basis of documents and information provided by the company during the course of investigation.
“Their statements corroborate with the written replies submitted to ED and the material on record,” the agency said.
The development comes in the backdrop of ED passing an order on April 29 to seize Xiaomi India’s funds worth over ₹5,551 crore over the alleged violation of the Indian foreign exchange law (Foreign Exchange Management Act).
The Karnataka High Court earlier this week stayed this ED order.
The agency added that the statement of Xiaomi global vice president Manu Kumar Jain was recorded on four occasions, April 13, April 14, April 21 and April 26 while that of chief financial officer (CFO) Sameer B S Rao was recorded on six occasions.
Rao’s statement were recorded on March 25, April 14, April 19, April 21, April 22 and April 26, it said.
“However, no complaint was filed by them at any point of time during recording of statements at various occasions.”
“Last statement of the officials of the company was recorded on 26.04.2022 and the seizure order was passed on 29.04.2022. It appears that allegation now made after passage of substantial time is an afterthought,” it said.
The agency said the allegations of Xiaomi are “baseless and far from the facts.”
Xiaomi is a trader and distributor of mobile phones in the country under the brand name of MI.